Cheers!
Monday, October 3, 2011
Halloween Time
So like many of you, I love Halloween. I love it so much, I'm still dressing up and that fact makes me proud. I'd like to do a top 10 or 20 Halloween blog but I want user input. So please post in the comments your favourite Halloween movies in the comments, feel free to discuss and I'll perhaps gather some inspiration from my faithful readers. All like, 5 of you.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Going Ape
I've had a fairly stressful week at work, which means my movie-seeing ratio is up and I'm being far less discerning. Which explains how I was convinced to see Rise of Planet of the Apes. I'm generally not into unnecessary sequels, let alone unnecessary prequels. So with my expectations set reasonably low, my friend and I grabbed tickets and had the theatre to ourselves, save for two weirdos in the back.
The film that played was entertaining, surprisingly touching, and quite simply...good.
I KNOW! I'm surprised too. But seriously, it's a solid film thorugh and through. It revolves around a young scientist (Franco) testing apes to cure Alzheimer's. He saves/adopts a baby chimpanzee whom he names Caesar. Caesar's genetic code contains the smart-drug Franco was working on and so the ape has advanced intellect. But raising a really smart chimpanzee has it's issues. This gave the writer two choices - slapstick comedy a la Space Chimps or go more hard-hitting and dramatic.
Now having seen it, I can guess that good writing initially attracted Franco and Serkis to the film. Also, Andy Serkis has a copyright on all monkey roles. From there, Rupert Wyatt and the cast do wonderfully understated jobs at allowing the film to unfold through the characters. The post-production work is spectacular, just downright amazing. Mo-cap has seriously come leaps and bounds in the last few years.
Now having seen it, I can guess that good writing initially attracted Franco and Serkis to the film. Also, Andy Serkis has a copyright on all monkey roles. From there, Rupert Wyatt and the cast do wonderfully understated jobs at allowing the film to unfold through the characters. The post-production work is spectacular, just downright amazing. Mo-cap has seriously come leaps and bounds in the last few years.
In fact, let's just talk about the role of Caesar for a moment and the work that went into creating him. So not only does Andy Serkis portray him, but you've got so many people working to make this character multi-dimensional, likable, and realistic. If even a handful screwup it's a lot of time and money and then it looks like shit on screen. But what a great job! I don't want to give too much away, but Caeser's humanity is not just about intelligence, it's portrayed in an emotional aspect as well - you watch his growth as a person, made possible by Serkis and the FX teams.
Serkis doesn't overshadow anybody though. James Franco gives a solid performance and John Lithgow captures the heartbreaking state of Alzheimer's patients perfectly. The movie also references the Heston original in passing at a few locations. Keep your ears open for a "Bright Eyes" a "Cornealia" and that one super famous line.
The film has a few weakspots and could've perhaps shaved 15 or 20 minutes off the runtime, but it's moving and entertaining with solid monkey action and it sets up the original film nicely (which any real prequel should). However, don't be surprised if some kind of "War for Planet of the Apes" or equally horribly titled se-pre-quel comes out because there's definitely room to do it.
7.5/10
Saturday, September 10, 2011
September 2011 Film You Should Know But Probably Don't
Barry Lyndon
Yes, the secret is out. I'm a Stanley Kubrick fan. And fuck everyone who says Ryan O'Neil's accent sucks in this. There is so much more to enjoy about this movie!
The main thing you should incredibly impressed by is how freakin' gorgeous the cinematography is. The entire film looks like a damn oil painting. This was achieved through the use of natural light and ONLY natural light. Kubrick had to design/steal from NASA/request a special camera lens just in order to pull off shooting with such low light (candles don't exactly stand up to your 10k lamps). There are a lot of fun Hollywood rumors and theories as to where the lens came from and how he got it. As best I understand it, there was a bit of construction by Kubrick himself using NASA lenses. But my favourite is my old cinematography teacher's theory:
"NASA gave Kubrick the lens in exchange for shooting the moon landing."
I absolutely love the idea behind that but let's all face reality. The moon landing footage would look so much better if Kubrick had made it. It was probably Roger Corman.
Back to the film. For those of you who don't know, Barry Lyndon is the assumed name of a drunk Irish asshole who keeps getting himself into duels and other types of trouble. He's forced out of his Irish village in the beginning and slowly makes his way to France where he tries to squeeze every penny out of anybody he can.
There's a rather fantastic use of narration - the narrator gives away everything before it happens. Kubrick played with narration similarly in his earlier film The Killing (featuring Sterling Hayden). It's that kind of self-awareness and utter command of the film medium that lifts this film from being merely good and nice looking to truly great and utterly stunning.
Some people knock the acting. I say they probably have an extra chromosome. Ryan O'Neil is fantastic and I won't believe otherwise. Also, a very young Leon Vitali pulls off an extraordinary performance as the slighted step-son. Vitali would go on to become Kubrick's personal assistant through the rest of his film career and play the Red Cape in Eyes Wide Shut.
Remember to keep a sharp eye out for some of Kubrick's favourite players who tend to appear in his films time and time again such as Steven Berkoff and Patrick Magee. Make sure you aren't watching it on some 2-inch screen off your iPhone - it's probably best if you have the lights off as well, really get that full effect. Right. Enjoy.
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Why My Labour Day Was Better Than Yours
And here's a hint: it's not because I spell labour correctly. Though you're getting warm. I spent my labour day night in an IMAX theatre watching the latest Harry Potter in 3D. I know it came out in July, and that this review is therefore two months late, but whatever, it was awesome and I feel the need to share this.
Enjoy that picture. I had written a fairly lengthy review talking about how awesome the cast was, the director, the DP and the movie in general as well as the significance of the scene in white at the end and the deaths of certain semi-major characters. But then my save failed and erased it all and I'm too annoyed to rewrite the whole thing.
10/10
For a treat, check out David Yate's first few films, among them The Girl in the Cafe and Sex Traffic.
Enjoy that picture. I had written a fairly lengthy review talking about how awesome the cast was, the director, the DP and the movie in general as well as the significance of the scene in white at the end and the deaths of certain semi-major characters. But then my save failed and erased it all and I'm too annoyed to rewrite the whole thing.
10/10
For a treat, check out David Yate's first few films, among them The Girl in the Cafe and Sex Traffic.
Friday, August 26, 2011
You Gave Me Such a Fright Night!
Shall I start this by saying I was not going to review this film. No intention whatsoever. I mainly planned on seeing it to celebrate David Tennant's first major Hollywood role and so I dragged along a good friend and off we went, donning our "Real-D" glasses. It soon became apparent that not only was I going to review this film, but I am duty-bound to do just that.
For those of you who didn't see or ever hear of the first one, this is a vampire movie! Spoiler. The vampires are not very nice. And head vampire Jerry (Colin Farrell) has moved in right next door to our hero, Charlie (Anton Yelchin). To save his mother (Toni Collette) and girlfriend (Imogen Poots), Charlie seeks the help of Peter Vincent (David Tennant), who is sort of a Criss Angel parody. And so the match is set, the war waged, and off we are on a lovely little adventure!
Every film starts with a script, and the writing of Fright Night is tight knit and funny. On more than one occasion I found myself first stricken with laughter and then suddenly heart all a flutter in suspense in a lovely sort of dance. Pacing was right on and everything fits tidily into 106 minutes.
The actors fully absorb the words and make them their own; not a bad performance out of the lot. And keep your eye open for a certain Franco's younger brother and the original Jerry. The characters aren't exactly multi-dimensional, but they're nicely fleshed out for the genre. Yelchin constructs a strong but sensitive kid trying to define who he is and is opposed nicely by Farrell's self-centered, creepy vamp-tramp king.
Supporting cast are all a riot - Christopher Mintz-Plasse makes an appearance as Ed, a childhood friend Charlie left behind, and David Tennant is endearing and pretty hilarious as the scallawag with a haunted past. And a shoutout for my ladies! Toni Collette is lovely as usual portraying a mother who refreshingly pays attention to her son and Imogen Poots takes what could have been a standard "oh I'm a frightened teen girl" to the girl you want her to be.
All in all, this is a nice little feather for director Craig Gillespie's odd hat. And this brings me to why I'm reviewing this. I wrote this film off for a few reasons. First of all, it's been released at the end of the summer against no real competition. Second, it was not released at Halloween. Third, given both those things, the film hasn't done well. And what a shame! I think the distributors made a real mistake not holding out for a Halloween release. What fun it'd be to stay up late and go get scared with this movie in the autumn frenzy of All Hallow's Eve! This is my attempt to save this movie - GO SEE IT!
8/10
8/10
Monday, August 22, 2011
Who Are You (Who, Who)
So I'm breaking from the normal critique to give you folks an editorial tonight. With the second half of series six of Doctor Who premiering this coming Saturday on BBC America, I thought it'd be fun to share my thoughts on the different Doctors. For the sake of brevity, we'll just be focusing on the two most recent.
There's the constant question. Which Doctor is better, best, more likable. They are constantly being compared to each other. I don't think that's the right way to look at it. When the Doctor regenerates, yes he changes physically, but there's very clearly psychological change that takes place. And let's think about it this way - if you died, something would change about you too. You might be grateful, pissed, resentful, overjoyed, relieved. About a million different emotions go into it.
Working chronologically, when David Tennant's Doctor arrives, we find him re-awakened. Christopher Eccleston's portrayal is sardonic, angry, and in a lot of denial about the events of the Time War. By the time he regenerates to Tennant, we find that he's moved on to deep sorrow balanced out by a brilliantly curious quirkiness. This is a Doctor who grins like he means it. He says things like "alonzi," eager for plain fun adventure. He handles his foes with less anger and more of a controlled contempt for violence than anything.
Through three seasons, we peel away the layers of this Doctor who thoroughly enjoys life. We find that beneath his jovial exterior beat two very feeling hearts. By making himself more amiable, more accessible to love, he's made himself more open to heartbreak as well. He constantly must tear open the wounds in order to save the people he loves, right to the very end. And that's the kind of thing that changes a man...or Time Lord. Towards the end, we see the Doctor trying to figure out exactly who and what he is, and in one of the most heart-wrenching moments of the show, he's not ready to leave when it's his time to go. He's not done; but it's time.
And so Tennant's Doctor dies and Matt Smith's Doctor is born from the ashes. (This is also the point when the Doctor Who torch is passed on from Russel T. Davies to Steven Moffat, so obviously writing styles are different and things will change. I do not wish to compare these writers; I think they're both great and accomplish(ed) different things with their work.) Right away, there's something a bit mad about him. It's no longer quirky, it's aloof bordering on insanity. And then there's the anger. I personally think the madness is a defense mechanism, hiding the anger deep away inside. If he can deflect long enough, maybe he won't think about all the pain he endured so recently to save his beloved planet Earth. But that anger sits just below the surface - do anything to make it bubble through and instantly regret it.
A line Matt Smith repeats, "Never had that before," seems to be apt for the changes present in this Doctor. He's never been quite this angry, quite this vengeful, or confrontational. He's lost the people he loves before and now heaven help anybody who comes between him and his companions. I think if this wasn't balanced out with Matt Smith's incredible ability to act like a six year old and nine hundred year old at the same time, we'd lose our affection for him from time to time. He pushes the limits sometimes, but hey, the best heroes do.
So for all those imdb message board trolls going, "Tennant is way better, bring him back," or "No, you suck monkey brains, Matt Smith is the best ever," let's all try and remember that you're basically trying to compare performances of two different characters. And that never really works. So just enjoy them both and get on with enjoying this fantastic show.
There's the constant question. Which Doctor is better, best, more likable. They are constantly being compared to each other. I don't think that's the right way to look at it. When the Doctor regenerates, yes he changes physically, but there's very clearly psychological change that takes place. And let's think about it this way - if you died, something would change about you too. You might be grateful, pissed, resentful, overjoyed, relieved. About a million different emotions go into it.
Working chronologically, when David Tennant's Doctor arrives, we find him re-awakened. Christopher Eccleston's portrayal is sardonic, angry, and in a lot of denial about the events of the Time War. By the time he regenerates to Tennant, we find that he's moved on to deep sorrow balanced out by a brilliantly curious quirkiness. This is a Doctor who grins like he means it. He says things like "alonzi," eager for plain fun adventure. He handles his foes with less anger and more of a controlled contempt for violence than anything.
And so Tennant's Doctor dies and Matt Smith's Doctor is born from the ashes. (This is also the point when the Doctor Who torch is passed on from Russel T. Davies to Steven Moffat, so obviously writing styles are different and things will change. I do not wish to compare these writers; I think they're both great and accomplish(ed) different things with their work.) Right away, there's something a bit mad about him. It's no longer quirky, it's aloof bordering on insanity. And then there's the anger. I personally think the madness is a defense mechanism, hiding the anger deep away inside. If he can deflect long enough, maybe he won't think about all the pain he endured so recently to save his beloved planet Earth. But that anger sits just below the surface - do anything to make it bubble through and instantly regret it.
A line Matt Smith repeats, "Never had that before," seems to be apt for the changes present in this Doctor. He's never been quite this angry, quite this vengeful, or confrontational. He's lost the people he loves before and now heaven help anybody who comes between him and his companions. I think if this wasn't balanced out with Matt Smith's incredible ability to act like a six year old and nine hundred year old at the same time, we'd lose our affection for him from time to time. He pushes the limits sometimes, but hey, the best heroes do.
So for all those imdb message board trolls going, "Tennant is way better, bring him back," or "No, you suck monkey brains, Matt Smith is the best ever," let's all try and remember that you're basically trying to compare performances of two different characters. And that never really works. So just enjoy them both and get on with enjoying this fantastic show.
Friday, August 19, 2011
I Get By With a Little Help From My Friends
Thursday turned out to be a lovely day to roll out the very tiny red carpet and check out The Help at the local theatre. I won't say I was chomping at the bit to see this film, but I was very intrigued. The film, set in 1960's Mississippi, centers around a young writer nicknamed Skeeter (Emma Stone) and her series of interviews with the black maids in her town. She and he co-conspirators (Viola Davis and Octavia Spencer) meet in secret to reveal the horrific racism of the white housewives in Jackson. Despite this, its clear these maids truly love the white children they care for as much as their own children, for whom they desire only better than they had.
The film is built on strong female characters, from lead to supporting. Emma Stone embraces this dramatic role with maturity and a healthy amount of sass. It's definitely a new page in her book, which up until now has been primarily comedic. The relationships between her and the other women of the film bind the main story to its subplots, so it's important that they work. The hint of a good friendship going slowly sour with her and Bryce Dallas Howard, the sense that she never quite pleased her mother, and the building of trust between her and Viola Davis - it all builds and builds the film and fleshes out even the minor characters.
The supporting cast charms their way through the film. Octavia Spencer is absolutely hilarious as Minny and Sissy Spacek is lovable as Bryce Dallas Howard's mother. Everyone seems to 'fit' in the world - it's all very real and embedded.
From a production standpoint, the film was very well done. Solid editing, beautiful photography, and great production design. All of these things being said, there is still something holding the film back from being truly amazing.
It's a good film, even a great one perhaps, garnering it's strength from its subtlety. But it's almost a little too quiet, too reserved. I wanted these women to really conquer and conquer something evil. I am not a fan of meaningless violence, but when it serves the story, especially when that story is historical fiction, I think violence has it's place. These people actually suffered. A lot. And most of us watching this film aren't really going to understand what they went through and what they overcame. You can hint at it and talk about it, but the only way to draw a truly powerful emotional response is to show us, without shame.
7.5/10
The film is built on strong female characters, from lead to supporting. Emma Stone embraces this dramatic role with maturity and a healthy amount of sass. It's definitely a new page in her book, which up until now has been primarily comedic. The relationships between her and the other women of the film bind the main story to its subplots, so it's important that they work. The hint of a good friendship going slowly sour with her and Bryce Dallas Howard, the sense that she never quite pleased her mother, and the building of trust between her and Viola Davis - it all builds and builds the film and fleshes out even the minor characters.
The supporting cast charms their way through the film. Octavia Spencer is absolutely hilarious as Minny and Sissy Spacek is lovable as Bryce Dallas Howard's mother. Everyone seems to 'fit' in the world - it's all very real and embedded.
From a production standpoint, the film was very well done. Solid editing, beautiful photography, and great production design. All of these things being said, there is still something holding the film back from being truly amazing.
It's a good film, even a great one perhaps, garnering it's strength from its subtlety. But it's almost a little too quiet, too reserved. I wanted these women to really conquer and conquer something evil. I am not a fan of meaningless violence, but when it serves the story, especially when that story is historical fiction, I think violence has it's place. These people actually suffered. A lot. And most of us watching this film aren't really going to understand what they went through and what they overcame. You can hint at it and talk about it, but the only way to draw a truly powerful emotional response is to show us, without shame.
7.5/10
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
The Rest Is Silence
For those of you who know me lately, I have been on what one might call a kick. Perhaps mild obsession. Whatever you want to call it, ever since my good friend showed me this damn amazing show I have been tracking down whatever I can find starring David Tennant.
As a filmmaker, this tends to be what I do whenever I find an artist that I admire so I've been down this road before (Stanley Kubrick, Gary Oldman, Leonardo DaVinci). In some cases (not naming names), it has brought me to low and lonely places. Not so in the grand adventures of Mr. Tennant! And my latest discovery was buying Hamlet on blu-ray. This particular film is an adaptation of the stage production of the same, including original cast.
So some background: I am a huge Shakespeare fan and Hamlet is my absolute favourite of his plays. I am picky, so I prepare myself to be let down when I watch new adaptations. I don't subscribe to any of the "insanity" or "oedipal" bullshit that's surfaced in the last century and the play makes me extremely emotional. Since I am a woman, this also makes me lethal, so don't fuck with m Hamlet.
All that being said, I delved right in! There is a wonderful dark neutrality about the set, mirroring the darkness set upon young lord Hamlet. Mirrors themselves, playing a pivotal role in the stage version, are rampant throughout the set design - the broken mirror a classic representation of the fractured mind. The director utilizes the camera well with the soliloquies and asides and presents us with many interesting angles and some gloriously long takes.
But the performances, you ask! Okay, as unbiased as I can possibly be... David Tennant was absolutely stunning and heartbreaking in this. I think I would die to see the stage production, because his emotion was so incredibly raw yet subtle, cutting through the fancy words to what the character truly feels. He also plays with the comedy more than I'd seen before, and I thought that was a stroke of genius. It fleshed out Hamlet so he's not so mopey; he's lively and witty and yet full of pain. He captures the essence of the character that I related to so well upon first reading it while going through a loss of my own. Just, bravo. Bravo, Mr. Tennant!
And bravo to Patrick Stewart! I always figured that no matter what, he'd always be Professor X and Captain Picard to me, or possibly this guy. But it's now resolved - if I ever, ever meet this amazing man, I will thank him profusely for acting the hell out of Claudius. Trust me folks, it's all in the ending and the rest is a fantastic journey up to it.
And the supporting cast completely keeps up pace. Penny Downie's Gertrude made me feel for that woman for the first time ever and Oliver Ford Davies as Polonius was charming. Basically, I have no complaints in the acting at any point in the film. I can't even say that about Branagh's version!
Not to gloss over it too much because these guys do hard work, but briefly I have to acknowledge the other departments. The DP did a great job with lighting and handling all the mirrored sets. I thought the editing was great! I did notice a few hiccups in the sound, but I'm overtrained and overlistening for the most part.
10/10
As a filmmaker, this tends to be what I do whenever I find an artist that I admire so I've been down this road before (Stanley Kubrick, Gary Oldman, Leonardo DaVinci). In some cases (not naming names), it has brought me to low and lonely places. Not so in the grand adventures of Mr. Tennant! And my latest discovery was buying Hamlet on blu-ray. This particular film is an adaptation of the stage production of the same, including original cast.
So some background: I am a huge Shakespeare fan and Hamlet is my absolute favourite of his plays. I am picky, so I prepare myself to be let down when I watch new adaptations. I don't subscribe to any of the "insanity" or "oedipal" bullshit that's surfaced in the last century and the play makes me extremely emotional. Since I am a woman, this also makes me lethal, so don't fuck with m Hamlet.
All that being said, I delved right in! There is a wonderful dark neutrality about the set, mirroring the darkness set upon young lord Hamlet. Mirrors themselves, playing a pivotal role in the stage version, are rampant throughout the set design - the broken mirror a classic representation of the fractured mind. The director utilizes the camera well with the soliloquies and asides and presents us with many interesting angles and some gloriously long takes.
But the performances, you ask! Okay, as unbiased as I can possibly be... David Tennant was absolutely stunning and heartbreaking in this. I think I would die to see the stage production, because his emotion was so incredibly raw yet subtle, cutting through the fancy words to what the character truly feels. He also plays with the comedy more than I'd seen before, and I thought that was a stroke of genius. It fleshed out Hamlet so he's not so mopey; he's lively and witty and yet full of pain. He captures the essence of the character that I related to so well upon first reading it while going through a loss of my own. Just, bravo. Bravo, Mr. Tennant!
And bravo to Patrick Stewart! I always figured that no matter what, he'd always be Professor X and Captain Picard to me, or possibly this guy. But it's now resolved - if I ever, ever meet this amazing man, I will thank him profusely for acting the hell out of Claudius. Trust me folks, it's all in the ending and the rest is a fantastic journey up to it.
And the supporting cast completely keeps up pace. Penny Downie's Gertrude made me feel for that woman for the first time ever and Oliver Ford Davies as Polonius was charming. Basically, I have no complaints in the acting at any point in the film. I can't even say that about Branagh's version!
Not to gloss over it too much because these guys do hard work, but briefly I have to acknowledge the other departments. The DP did a great job with lighting and handling all the mirrored sets. I thought the editing was great! I did notice a few hiccups in the sound, but I'm overtrained and overlistening for the most part.
10/10
Sunday, August 14, 2011
Sir, There's a Firefly in My Soup
Okay, so I realize I'm late to this whole Firefly thing. The show was cancelled way before it's time by this crackerjack organization, and my friends have been bugging me for probably about four years to check out the show. Well, now I finally have decided to see what all the gorram fuss was about.
So by the end of the first episode, I was entertained but not blown away. But entertained is certainly enough for me to stick with it so I had the joy of watching these characters develop over the next fourteen episodes. There was clearly a lot of thought put into the creation of this "verse" - backstory leaks through constantly, peaking curiosity and embedding this sci-fi world into a reality.
China and the US merged to form one ginormous superpower, where you're either apparently high class society or a cowboy. The melding of the two societies was done very well and we come into the story quite a bit down the line. Earth that was has long since been uninhabitable and so the US/China Alliance went out into the galaxies and found new planets for everyone to exist all happy-like. They use a process called terraforming to convert the new rocks into environments as close to Earth as possible, but they can't seem to make much more than water and desert.
Our characters are fronted by the snarky (Joss Whedon specialty) but likeable Captain Malcolm "Mal" Reyonds, who fought against the Alliance in a great war. Zoe, Mal's Amazonian-esque righthand woman, fought with him and has stuck by his side ever since. Her husband, Wash (my personal favourite character), pilots Mal's ship, Serenity. He is aided by engineer, Kaylee, a sweet young thang who has a crush on Simon, an uppercrusty fugitive. Simon constantly nurses his sister, River, who's brain has been addled by the Alliance in a way nobody is quite sure of. The main gunslinger of this band of misfits is Jayne, played adorably by Adam Baldwin (NOT a Baldwin brother, I might add). And where would they be without god? Shepherd Book is this future's version of a priest, though there are hints he may be something more. Meanwhile, Mal rents out one of Serenity's shuttles to a "companion," Inara, who seems to be a futuristic version of a geisha.
So this cuddly band of thieves get themselves into all sorts of adventures. And here's what I'll say about them. I do not think this was the best show ever, as many claim. I do think it was a great show, a show that should NOT have been cancelled (remember, retarded company), and it's a show with great characters and a lot of emotion.
P.S.
SPOILER ALERT
All that said, one thing really bugged me. They cancelled this damn show before we got to see Mal and Inara get it on, and that's just not cool. That damn sexual tension was practically fogging up the inside of my tv. Also, major spoiler for the Serenity movie here, they killed Wash. He was my favourite. He played with dinosaurs and was freakin' hilarious. Joss Whedon, take note, you are officially on my shit list. But you're also damn talented, so cheers.
Friday, August 12, 2011
A Change of Pace
I've been using this blog mostly to rant. I have good reason to want to rant but haven't posted in a while because I felt ranted out. Now, at the encouragement of someone close to me, I'm going to try my hand at being an amateur movie critic.
I've always prided myself on being able to make recommendations for people that they might never have thought of before but are sure to love. If things pick up, I might go into full time critic mode and post my opinions on all the latest flicks. But for now, we'll start small.
I will post my first review tomorrow, and I'll be just tickled if anybody who reads this blog has even heard of it (me telling you previously does NOT count).
I've always prided myself on being able to make recommendations for people that they might never have thought of before but are sure to love. If things pick up, I might go into full time critic mode and post my opinions on all the latest flicks. But for now, we'll start small.
I will post my first review tomorrow, and I'll be just tickled if anybody who reads this blog has even heard of it (me telling you previously does NOT count).
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Anatomy of a Brain
...And beneath all the mud and the screaming, there was a city of forgotten children. They stood thick, like a forrest. And like a forrest, made no sound and did not move. They simply looked on, pale ghosts, condemning the world which left them behind, doomed to a life of solitude. Trapped in their own silence.
And should one fall through the mud, past the screaming, and beyond death, the children would surround them and gaze. They would see past the skin, through the eyes, and into the soul, and that one should cry out with all the rage and fury of a dying star. But the sound would be dampened by the masses...
DARKNESS! DARKNESS! Make it stop! A black cloud in my brain brings the thunder and the lightning. It pulls me from this world down to the next. The nether. I can feel the demons' claws 'round my brain, gripping tight and scratching down. But I can not see them. I can not name them, but in my mind. To give it a name gives it credence. To give it credence makes it real. To make it real is unbearable.
Now alone and naked, I lie, fetal, in the forrest. I move not, except to breathe. Fear seals my eyes. I hear a noise like the noise that began it all. A noise like despair hiding in the pit of your stomach. A noise with no echo. A bump in the night.
I spring from my bed of dirt, desperate to stop the noise. This time I will solve it. This time, but what if...What if the noise is a shadow which takes me deeper? Fear seeps even further as I run, cutting my bare skin on the claws of trees. I run and run until I stop before the cause. And it is a joke, played by Puck. Just a noise, vanished in the night. And once again, I curl on the dirt-woven floor. And I cry. And I sleep.
And should one fall through the mud, past the screaming, and beyond death, the children would surround them and gaze. They would see past the skin, through the eyes, and into the soul, and that one should cry out with all the rage and fury of a dying star. But the sound would be dampened by the masses...
**
DARKNESS! DARKNESS! Make it stop! A black cloud in my brain brings the thunder and the lightning. It pulls me from this world down to the next. The nether. I can feel the demons' claws 'round my brain, gripping tight and scratching down. But I can not see them. I can not name them, but in my mind. To give it a name gives it credence. To give it credence makes it real. To make it real is unbearable.
Now alone and naked, I lie, fetal, in the forrest. I move not, except to breathe. Fear seals my eyes. I hear a noise like the noise that began it all. A noise like despair hiding in the pit of your stomach. A noise with no echo. A bump in the night.
I spring from my bed of dirt, desperate to stop the noise. This time I will solve it. This time, but what if...What if the noise is a shadow which takes me deeper? Fear seeps even further as I run, cutting my bare skin on the claws of trees. I run and run until I stop before the cause. And it is a joke, played by Puck. Just a noise, vanished in the night. And once again, I curl on the dirt-woven floor. And I cry. And I sleep.
Monday, July 11, 2011
It's Not Emo If it's Real
as dusk breaks day
and night swoops in
it's dark cape twirling 'round,
the village it sleeps
as the sky above weeps
for you are not here to be found.
toll the bells high
and search the ground low
surely you have not yet fled.
but as dawn does approach
and the sunlight encroach
it seems certain to all - you are dead.
so now there is pain
there's an ache in my soul
i swear you have left me too soon.
for as wise men can say
and fools squander away
our love was just beginning to bloom.
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Monday, July 4, 2011
Holidays are the Hardest, Or So They Say
Happy 4th of July. Relatively. Not to complain. Not to mope. Not to...whatever you're thinking. But they do say the holidays are the hardest to deal with after a loss. You might think that the 4th of July isn't a big deal - not like Thanksgiving or Christmas - but in my town, we go all out for the 4th of July, and I had plans...we had plans. And honestly, that's one of the most difficult things for me to deal with - all the plans I had to give up on, all the dreams, and hopes that centered around that one person being alive still.
None of this is meant to belittle or negate the pain that I know many of us are feeling right now. Pain. Anger. Sadness. I know we are all going through something. I also know we're all going through something different. And for some reason, I'm not really able to talk about it, so I write. Part of me hopes that me writing all of this comforts the rest of you. But most of me just needs to get it out.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Doesn't that feel good? Even just in your head?
AHHHHHHHHHHHHH! FUCK! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!
Yes. That helps doesn't it? That helps me when I see the fireworks and think of his smile. That helps me when I think of his ears and his nose. It helps when I think of his kindness, and his laugh. I yell and I curse and it helps. Not much helps but that seems to.
None of this is meant to belittle or negate the pain that I know many of us are feeling right now. Pain. Anger. Sadness. I know we are all going through something. I also know we're all going through something different. And for some reason, I'm not really able to talk about it, so I write. Part of me hopes that me writing all of this comforts the rest of you. But most of me just needs to get it out.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Doesn't that feel good? Even just in your head?
AHHHHHHHHHHHHH! FUCK! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!
Yes. That helps doesn't it? That helps me when I see the fireworks and think of his smile. That helps me when I think of his ears and his nose. It helps when I think of his kindness, and his laugh. I yell and I curse and it helps. Not much helps but that seems to.
Friday, June 24, 2011
Moving On and Walking Backwards
As anger subsides, it leaves a void. And voids are made to be filled - but with what? I believe we have choices in life. I can fill my void with sadness, or anger and just repeat a cycle or I can choose to fill it with something else. Me personally, I think I'm juggling between hope and despair. I take one step forward and two steps back. For half the day I take a deep breath and don't even think about what's happened and then, somewhere along the line, sorrow drips slowly back in and suddenly I'm drowning in it.
So how do you cope? I cut my hair ridiculously short and played a lot of video games and watched a lot of movies. I decided I'm going to Scotland in November (I'll find a way to afford it goddamnit!). Basically, I distract myself. And I think distractions are my saving grace. Because without them I'd be a sopping mess.
I think that's why the day is easy - so much to keep me busy - but nighttime is so difficult. You get so used to somebody being next to you at night, you have that sense of safety and love. And suddenly they're gone? What about my safety?
But you realise that's silly, it's selfish, and most importantly it's not true. Number one, they are only gone in a physical sense (yes I believe in spiritual lives). Number two, you can provide yourself safety, whether you need to get a dog or a baseball bat, you CAN find a way to supplement that feeling, though it won't ever be the same. Number three, who is to say that love you felt is gone? If it's love, it'll never be gone. You will always love them at least a little bit and they will always love you. And that's what get's me through.
So how do you cope? I cut my hair ridiculously short and played a lot of video games and watched a lot of movies. I decided I'm going to Scotland in November (I'll find a way to afford it goddamnit!). Basically, I distract myself. And I think distractions are my saving grace. Because without them I'd be a sopping mess.
I think that's why the day is easy - so much to keep me busy - but nighttime is so difficult. You get so used to somebody being next to you at night, you have that sense of safety and love. And suddenly they're gone? What about my safety?
But you realise that's silly, it's selfish, and most importantly it's not true. Number one, they are only gone in a physical sense (yes I believe in spiritual lives). Number two, you can provide yourself safety, whether you need to get a dog or a baseball bat, you CAN find a way to supplement that feeling, though it won't ever be the same. Number three, who is to say that love you felt is gone? If it's love, it'll never be gone. You will always love them at least a little bit and they will always love you. And that's what get's me through.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
One Helluva First Blog Post...
Why am I writing this? And why is it called Glorious Surrender? Well, I have an answer for those questions and it's pretty much the same. My boyfriend died just about three weeks ago. Since then, externally, I've been holding it together fine. Going to work everyday, talking, even laughing with friends. Internally though, I'm fucked up. And why shouldn't I be? Life will NEVER be the same.
My boyfriend was lucky enough to have a large group of family and friends that loved him, which in turn has created a sort of support system. The problem though, I suspect for each of us, is that we each knew him differently and will thus mourn him differently. That's how mourning works. You go through phases. I'm currently in the, "lonely, angry," phase, the, "I don't really give a shit that you're upset too," phase, the, "why the fuck did this happen to me?" phase. See, for me, I'm not only mourning the loss of his life and the love we had, I'm mourning the loss of the life we were supposed to have together.
I was supposed to say yes to that man when he asked me to marry him, walk down an aisle and say I do, have his children. That was the plan. Instead, I watched, helpless, as the best part of me slipped away behind his eyes before finally leaving all together. I sat, terrified in an uncomfortable hospital waiting room, until the surgeon came in and brusquely said, "And unfortunately, he died."
I wanted to punch him in the teeth.
But this is part of life right? This is how we learn? So that's why I'm writing this. Because I know I'm not the only one who's dealing with this or has dealt with this or will. And sharing our stories of loss and pain helps us not to feel so alone. And "Glorious Surrender" refers to what I'm doing with my life now. It has no religious connotation, don't run away with yourself. It just means I'm surrendering to the power of now, of life. And I'm not holding back any more.
My boyfriend was lucky enough to have a large group of family and friends that loved him, which in turn has created a sort of support system. The problem though, I suspect for each of us, is that we each knew him differently and will thus mourn him differently. That's how mourning works. You go through phases. I'm currently in the, "lonely, angry," phase, the, "I don't really give a shit that you're upset too," phase, the, "why the fuck did this happen to me?" phase. See, for me, I'm not only mourning the loss of his life and the love we had, I'm mourning the loss of the life we were supposed to have together.
I was supposed to say yes to that man when he asked me to marry him, walk down an aisle and say I do, have his children. That was the plan. Instead, I watched, helpless, as the best part of me slipped away behind his eyes before finally leaving all together. I sat, terrified in an uncomfortable hospital waiting room, until the surgeon came in and brusquely said, "And unfortunately, he died."
I wanted to punch him in the teeth.
But this is part of life right? This is how we learn? So that's why I'm writing this. Because I know I'm not the only one who's dealing with this or has dealt with this or will. And sharing our stories of loss and pain helps us not to feel so alone. And "Glorious Surrender" refers to what I'm doing with my life now. It has no religious connotation, don't run away with yourself. It just means I'm surrendering to the power of now, of life. And I'm not holding back any more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)